Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

https://owen-reed.thoughtlanes.net/how-to-wear-clothes-in-order-to-avoid-emf-1679568367  are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.

While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further distance from them.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore there is  Proteck'd Apparel  that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.